EXILE
Leong Yew

 
 
Like many of the other terms in postcolonial theory and discourse that popularly 
  suggest detachment from metropolitan or local spaces, "exile" has 
  been deployed as a concept beyond simply a forced removal from a given physical 
  location. Exile in everyday use invokes images of individual political dissidents 
  sent overseas or large groups of people banished to distant lands, forming various 
  diasporas. In these cases there is 
  sometimes a presumption that the exiled are different from casual migrants who 
  forget their original homelands and form new allegiances with the places in 
  which they settle. Exiles retain a sense of (be)longing to/for a real or imagined 
  homeland.
While such a presumption appears to be insufficient for postcolonial politics 
  and theory, an important premise of exile surrounds the act of individual/group 
  displacement and the effect such displacements have on the exiled's perception 
  of his or her current location, the homeland, and intellectual products. The 
  last item being manifested in the form of literary, artistic, political expressions, 
  and so on. In order for "exile" to be politically enabling in postcolonialism, 
  a number of things can occur:
  - Physical spaces are important because they are important sites of cultural 
    production; for example, a Nigerian exile living in Britain produces a novel 
    that engages both with her experiences growing up in Nigeria but current residence 
    in Britain. The work becomes one of ambivalence and hybridity, 
    expressing a sense of homelessness, nostalgia, being neither fully a Nigerian 
    nor British writing. Phsyical spaces are however only one aspect of exile. 
    In effect:
 
  - One doesn't need to physically removed from the "homeland" in 
    order to be exiled. Exile can take place in different cultural spaces, especially 
    through processes like colonization and modernization. 
    In this case by living in a place that has become culturally transformed through 
    colonialism, it is possible for exile to occur particularly when one realizes 
    that a traditional language, way of life, religion, 
    tribal practices can no longer be articulated or experienced without the mediation 
    of modernity. This causes a sense of loss and displacement from a traditional 
    homeland. 
 
  - As Edward Said stresses, exile can be both 
    "actual" and "metaphoric," "voluntary" or "involuntary." 
    (39) This last point is important because it indicates that physical violence 
    is not the only force to cause exile, but subtler forms of compulsion can 
    do the same as well. This can be seen in the case of intellectuals living 
    overseas for education or research. 
 
  - Exile, according to Said in Representations of the Intellectual, 
    is fundamentally tied to the notion of the intellectual. The connection with 
    postcolonialism is not easily discernible in this case because exile becomes 
    a larger political gesture to separate intellectuals from those who "toe 
    the line" and those who remain critically resistant to the authorities. 
    For Said these are "the nay-sayers, the individuals at odds with their 
    society and therefore outsidersand exiles in so far as privileges, power, 
    and honors are concerned." (39) 
 
What is important to grasp in postcolonial exile is therefore the profundity 
  of the impact of colonialism and ongoing imperialism. The term itself has to 
  be overdetermined so as to suggest the magnitude of cultural transformations 
  inflicted by colonialism, the type of consciousness exile produces, and responsibility 
  the exile should uphold. 
Sources
Said, Edward W. Representations of the Intellectual: 
  The 1993 Reith Lectures. London: Vintage, 1994.
Related Links
 
 
Last Modified: 8 
  March 2002