"A State of Perpetual Wandering":
Diaspora and Black British Writers
Bronwyn T. Williams, University
of New Hampshire
Copyright © 1999 by Bronwyn T. Williams, all rights
reserved. This article is reproduced with the kind permission of
the editors of JOUVERT:
Journal of Postcolonial Studies.
- In Britain it is the reality of the diaspora of empire within
the nation that most fundamentally disrupts this dominant narrative
of a unified, homogenous nation. More than simply introducing
other cultural and ethnic voices into the nation, the diaspora
in Britain is also what Kobena Mercer calls "a reminder and a
remainder of its historical past" (7), a physical presence that
underlines the paradox of immigration into Britain from its colonies
even as those colonies, and the prestige and power they embodied
and exemplified, were "lost" to independence. The postcolonial
diaspora is not simply immigration into Britain from other places,
as for example immigration into the United States or even Turkish
"guest workers" in Germany," but is instead a continual reminder
that "we are here because you were there" (7). Of course, there
are many reasons for the timing of this movement of diaspora into
the seat of empire; yet there is an unspoken sense within the
dominant culture that it is the impotence of the nation/state,
stripped of its empire, that is no longer able to keep the Other
comfortably across the sea. The idea of immigration itself, then,
violates Britain's sense of its secure national borders. This
perceived threat to national cohesion, in turn, challenges the
cultural identity of the White Englishman as being homogenous
and unitary. The response of the dominant culture to post-colonial
immigration has been what Stuart Hall calls a "defensive exclusivism.
. .an embattled defensiveness of a narrow, national definition
of Englishness, of cultural identity" ("The Local" 177). From
the National Front to Norman Tebbit's "cricket test" an enormous
amount of ideological energy has gone into defining and safeguarding
what the dominant culture sees as the end product of its national
narrative: true Englishness--and Englishness, by extension is
the default culture of the British state. [1]
- The voice of diaspora in Britain is a particular threat to the
dominant culture because it is not simply colonization in reverse,
not only the voice of the Other,
it is also the voice of hybridity.
In its repetition and response to the authoritative utterances
in the dominant culture it disrupts the nature of the dominant
discourse and opens "up a space of negotiation where power is
unequal but its articulation may be equivocal. Such negotiation
is neither assimilation nor collaboration (Bhabha,
"Culture's" 58). And from this space of hybrid discourse also
then comes the possibility of the movement of meaning within the
dominant culture.
|